Dictatorship of HSSC Chairman Himmat Singh: Law Officers Allege Pressure to Modify Independent Legal Opinions
Gustakhi Maaf Haryana – Pawan Kumar Bansal
After HPSC Chairman Alok Verma, now HSSC Chairman Himmat Singh — Law Officers Accuse HSSC Chairman of Harassment, Seek Independent Inquiry.
Law Officers posted in the Haryana Staff Selection Commission (HSSC) have submitted a formal complaint to the Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Haryana, alleging continuous mental harassment, abuse of authority, and the creation of a hostile work environment within the Commission.
In their representation, District Attorneys (DAs), Deputy District Attorneys (DDAs), and Assistant District Attorneys (ADAs) stated that the working atmosphere has become “deeply distressing and professionally demoralising” due to the administrative conduct and functioning of the Chairman. The officers alleged that despite performing their duties independently and in accordance with the law, they have been subjected to humiliating behaviour, coercive supervision, and unwarranted interference in their professional work.
According to the complaint, law officers are frequently addressed in insulting and aggressive language during official interactions, leading to emotional stress and erosion of professional dignity. The officers further alleged that they are often threatened with suspension, termination, adverse service entries, and disciplinary action without lawful grounds.
The representation also highlights administrative concerns, including verbal directions to work beyond prescribed office hours without written orders, last-minute cancellation of holidays without recorded urgency, and instructions to attend office on Sundays despite the absence of official exigency. Leave applications, the officers claimed, are rejected arbitrarily even in genuine cases.
A serious concern raised by the officers relates to alleged pressure to modify or dilute independent legal opinions without written directions. They stated that such interference compromises professional integrity and exposes them to legal and disciplinary risks. In some cases, officers were allegedly asked to personally bear litigation costs imposed by courts in official matters, despite no finding of misconduct.
The complaint also mentions procedural difficulties, such as files being marked with vague remarks like “Speak” without granting an opportunity for discussion, resulting in delays and subsequent blame being placed on the officers. They further alleged that they are required to personally carry bulky confidential files across offices without support, calling the practice humiliating and administratively unnecessary.
The officers stated that the prevailing environment has led to widespread fear, insecurity, and demoralisation. They referred to the voluntary retirement (VRS) of a District Attorney in 2025, which, according to the perception within the department, was influenced by sustained administrative pressure. Frequent repatriation of officers to their parent departments has also been cited as contributing to a climate of instability and apprehension.
In a specific incident dated February 26, 2026, the complainants alleged that the HSSC Chairman misbehaved with a District Attorney, used abusive and unparliamentary language in the presence of other officials, and subsequently ordered the officer’s immediate repatriation after issuing threats regarding his service record.
The officers further claimed that remarks were made during a meeting questioning their integrity and alleging that law officers were “worth Rs 10,000” and habitual bribe-takers, which they described as deeply insulting and damaging to their professional reputation.
Seeking intervention, the complainants have requested the State Government to constitute an independent and impartial inquiry under a senior authority not connected with HSSC. They have also sought immediate measures to ensure a safe and dignified workplace, protection from victimisation, and appropriate disciplinary or corrective action if the allegations are substantiated.
Copies of the complaint have been forwarded to the National Human Rights Commission, the Chief Minister of Haryana, the Chief Secretary, and the Director of Prosecution (General).
The officers emphasised that the issue concerns not only individual grievances but also the preservation of institutional integrity and professional independence within a key public recruitment body. They have urged urgent and sympathetic consideration of the matter in the interest of justice.
khabre junction