Gustakhi Maan Haryana-Pawan Kumar Bansal
A striking example of judicial vigilance came to light highlighting the advantage of the Haryana roots of Supreme Court Chief Justice Justice Surya Kant, whose sharp observation helped uncover an attempt to misuse the minority quota system.
A peculiar case was placed before Justice Surya Kant in which a person belonging to the Punia Jat community of Satrod village in Hisar sought admission to a postgraduate course under the minority quota. The applicant claimed eligibility by declaring that he had converted to Buddhism, thereby attempting to project himself as belonging to a minority community.
Justice Surya Kant’s keen judicial eye immediately detected the mischief involved in the case. Questioning the authenticity of the claim, he raised serious concerns about the manner in which a minority certificate had been issued to an individual from an upper-caste background. Taking a strict view of the matter, Justice Surya Kant sought an explanation from the Chief Secretary of Haryana, asking how such a minority certificate could have been granted in the first place.
The incident underscores the importance of judicial scrutiny in protecting the sanctity of reservation and minority benefits, and reflects Justice Surya Kant’s commitment to ensuring fairness and integrity in the education system. It also sends a strong message against attempts to manipulate legal provisions for personal gain.
