Feudal Mindset vs Protocol: MP’s Conduct Sparks Row at Review Meeting

Protocol Dispute Sparks Controversy During Review Meeting in Rohtak

Chairman’s Arrival Triggers Debate Over Protocol

A recent review meeting held in a government hall in Rohtak turned controversial due to a perceived breach of protocol concerning the arrival of the committee chairman, MP Deepender Singh Hooda. Critics argue that there was no need for the chairman to be formally received, stating that he has known the venue for over two decades and could easily walk in without ceremony. They accuse Indian politicians of encouraging a culture of feudalism, treating themselves like royalty instead of public servants.

Review Meeting Overshadowed by Protocol Clash

The meeting, meant to assess the progress of central government-funded projects, reportedly began without the chairman present. This drew criticism from some quarters, stating that meetings should not start without the chairman, and if they must, verbal permission should be sought beforehand as a mark of respect.

DC’s Absence Raises Eyebrows

Observers also pointed out that in the absence of the Deputy Commissioner (DC), it was questionable how the MP planned to effectively review the meeting. The presence of several aides accompanying the MP was also questioned, with critics sarcastically asking, “Which protocol allows for bringing four sycophants?”

Personal Allegiances and Past Friction Surface

The situation grew more complex with mentions of personal and political backgrounds. DC Rohtak is reportedly the son-in-law of the late Sh. Satya Pal Sangwan, and some felt that his body language during the incident was telling. Accusations were made that MP Ram Chander Jangra remained silent despite witnessing the undermining of protocol.

Allegations of Disrespect and Immaturity

Another perspective suggested that MP Deepender Hooda should have first visited the DC’s office for a brief tea meeting before proceeding to the hall, which would have shown institutional respect. Some claimed this was a continuation of past tensions, especially following derogatory remarks allegedly made by MLA Sangwan during a previous assembly session. The behavior was described as “childish” by some critics, who lamented that political grace seen in earlier times—when Bhupinder Singh Hooda was considered a father figure and Deepender a respected leader—is now missing.

This incident has sparked fresh debate on political conduct, institutional respect, and the lingering culture of entitlement within Indian politics.